was the iranian revolution good or bad
Good Revolution, Bad Revolution. The Revolution Begins . Biden says Trump wrote him 'a very generous letter' Biden's 'Amazon tax' could make things complicated. 53-72. It's something Iranians lived through and now deal with the results of, and now it's up to them to move forward. Many of those who picked him as the Iranian of the century did not do so because they agreed with what he did but because of his enormous impact -- good or bad. Is popular support for the current regime low? June.19.2009 at 7:19 pm ... Mmm, underzog, that’s some good crazy. Why was there a revolution in Iran in 1979? On April 1, following overwhelming support in a national referendum, Khomeini declared Iran an Islamic republic. The revolution of February 1979 was a revolt of the society against the state. Poverty is so bad in Iran that some people end up selling their body organs due to financial problems. The author paints a very negative opinion of both the Islamic Revolution and the Shah's regime, viewing them both as oppressive dictatorships who constantly trampled on the rights of its citizens. Framed in a Marxist–Islamist mindset, the revolution was made on behalf of the mostazafin—the downtrodden—who were left behind by the monarchy’s uneven development model. The Iranian revolution just turned 40. The Iranian The second highest number of votes (14%) in The Iranian survey went to the late Ayatollah Rouhollah Khomeini. Protesters deface Democratic headquarters in Oregon (shelved 1 time as iranian-revolution) avg rating 4.25 — 3,579 ratings — published 2016 Want to Read saving… Rafasanjani was an incredible help to the economy and the government, and remains in power today. First off let me get one thing out of the way: Shah was dictator and he was indeed, at first at least, very dependent on the west. 2. a radical and pervasive change in society and the social structure, especially one made suddenly and often accompanied by violence. In your opinion, was the revolution a net positive or was the added discrimination against women and political dissenters worse than what the Shah did? Celebrating its 35th anniversary, Iran’s Islamic Revolution shocked the world and redrew the map of global alliances. I could keep going, the revolution was one of the biggest mistakes in the history of Iran, it has set us back many decades, and resulted in losing opportunities that could have led to Iran becoming an economic powerhouse. The 1979 revolution, which brought together Iranians across many different social groups, has its roots in Iran’s long history. “Iran 's revolution began with a popular democracy movement and ended with the establishment of the world 's first Islamic state.” (In pictures: The Iranian Revolution) There are various parties that have different viewpoints and opinions of the revolution. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Good Iranian, Bad Iranian: Representations of Iran and Iranians in Time and Newsweek (1998–2009) Iranian Studies: Vol. [6] In the prison literature of the Pahlavi era, the recurring words had been "boredom" and "monotony." The Iranian society in the time when Marjane was living there, shows that cultural beliefs became corrupt by the government powers that influence the bad decision making for the country of Iran. The Iranian revolution at 40 American sanctions on Iran keep the mullahs mighty. He was wrong. Students First of all, it was NOT a revolution, it was a hijacking. The 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran has proved one of the most consequential events in the history of modern terrorism. The year is 1979 with Iran’s Islamic Revolution in full swing. Something significant has to change - either in Iran, or outside Iran with the people tacitly supporting this regime. I’d be very curious to see a “coup” that puts him back in power, to see if he would really stay pro democracy and willingly step down if the people voted him out or just turn the country into a monarchy again. This simulation exercise will allow your students to find out. Unhappy with … This is something that the regime should have prepared for 40 years as Shah was but it's only getting worse. The world tends to look at Iran in the context of pre-revolution and post. While some shifts in Western media representations of Iranians have occurred in the thirty years since the revolution, the underlying ontological assumptions of these representations have remained remarkably durable. Throughout most of 1979 the Revolutionary Guards—then an informal religious militia formed by Khomeini to forestall another CIA-backed coup as in the days of Mosaddegh—engaged in similar activity, aimed at intimidating and repressing political groups not under the control of the ruling Revolutionary Council and its sister Islamic Republican Party, both clerical organizations loyal to Khomeini. The Iranian revolution has confounded experts from a variety of disciplines and backgrounds. Due to the Shah’s economic reforms, Iran had ascended into the ranks as a globally formidable industrial economy. The Family Protection Act (1967; significantly amended in 1975), which provided further guarantees and rights to women in marriage, was declared void, and mosque-based revolutionary bands known as komītehs (Persian: “committees”) patrolled the streets enforcing Islamic codes of dress and behaviour and dispatching impromptu justice to perceived enemies of the revolution. Simple as that. Outwardly, with a swiftly expanding economy and a rapidly modernizing infrastructure, everything was...…, Carter’s success in Middle Eastern diplomacy was likewise undercut by the collapse of the strongest and...…, The 1979 revolution in Iran, which ended the Pahlavi monarchy there, dovetailed with developments in...…. I mean, the CIA literally put him into power through a coup because they didn't like anything remotely socialist. The Shah was a brutal US puppet. (2013). The Iranian regime uses the “good cop, bad cop” strategy in all these ways. They had religious and political freedom The Iranian Shah Conclusion: In conclusion we believe the Iranian Revolution caused more harm than good for the citizens and The Iranian Revolution is over, and the country is back on its feet. Or they can just wallow in the past. In retrospect, was the revolution a success or a failure? The opening of Marjane Satrapi's novel Persepolis introduces the reader to the veil and to one of the changes brought forth by the Islamic Revolution. Iranians today are much poorer compared to 40 years ago, in fact when comparing people's wages, we earn nearly 6 times less than we used to do during Shah's time. 1 decade ago. Yeah I'm not really a fan of the theocracy that popped up after the revolution either, but saying that the Shah or his son would have gradually given up power is a little naive in my opinion. Yeah heard about the protests going on, didn't know too much about them and still don't. Saddam was still bitter about longstanding border disputes between Iran and Iraq over the Shatt al-Arab waterway. The militias and the clerics they supported made every effort to suppress Western cultural influence, and, facing persecution and violence, many of the Western-educated elite fled the country. I'm not even Iranian, but I know that from visiting and listening. Good Iranian, bad Iranian: Representations of Iran and Iranians in time and Newsweek (1998-2009) Sam Fayyaz, Roozbeh Shirazi. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. 9 2,335 4 minutes read. By signing up for this email, you are agreeing to news, offers, and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica. Iran has a great number of allies, which improves its ties with the west. https://old.reddit.com/r/iran/comments/9409ny/human_rights_under_mohammad_reza_pahlavi/. In some of its basic characteristics, the revolution did not conform to the usual norms of Western revolutions, because the state did not represent just an ordinary dictatorship but an absolute and arbitrary system that lacked political legitimacy and a social base virtually across the whole of the society. The Islamic Revolution of 1979 brought seismic changes to Iran, not least for women. The violence and brutality often exceeded that which had taken place under the shah. Prelude to revolution. The bad guys, at whose hands Iran suffered ... America the good. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Efforts toward satisfactory reform were continually stifled, however, amid reemerging … Today, Iran has practically no allies among the Middle Eastern states. Just because they both sell oil, doesn't make them similar in other aspects. “But now we are on two different sides of the spectrum. And the country got back to square one:/ and it's going backward now. The very same people that brought the mullahs to power (and deceived Iranians) continue to make life for ordinary Iranians hell ... today! Also by today his son’s power would’ve been shrunk to the limits of most monarch around the work (I.e. The truth about Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and the Iranian revolution of 1979 (Roman, president) User Name: Remember Me: Password : Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! To be fair, I wouldn't trust any peace I made with the dictator who just invaded my country and killed thousands of civilians. The Iranian liberal intellectuals who had helped create the revolution wanted to replace the shah's four-decade-old regime of corruption, subservience to fore Khomeynī was to become the de facto leader of the Iranian Revolution and his teachings formed the basis of the new theocratic state, the Islamic Republic of Iran, which would put Iran at odds not only with the West but most of its Middle Eastern neighbors as well. It is ten trillion times worse now in every way, technologically, economically, socially than it ever was under the shah, the islamic regime is a true death sentence to the iranian people and the revolution was a sham from the get go, people were promised free water, electricity, foods, housing, busses, as you would expect, they never got any of that. It presumes a world where the good and bad of a political situation can be distilled down into how one can dress. The Revolution Begins Throughout the 1970s, as Iran reaped enormous profits from oil production, a gap widened between the wealthy (many of whom were relatives of the Shah) and the poor. Corruption is at an all time high, every prominent regime member today has accrued vast amounts of wealth. it … 46, No. I personally believe if shah would’ve stayed in power, he would’ve died within 3-4 years after 1979, son would’ve took power and would’ve taken many action to help freedom of speech and other liberties. There are many reasons why the United States protects its dictator friends in the Middle East and ventures out of its way to make sure they stay in power. He was not a bad ruler. Jahangir Amuzegar, The Dynamics of the Iranian Revolution 27 (SUNY 1991). The 1979 Iranian Revolution was a major landmark in Iranian history. It has since been argued that the U.S.’s role in the overthrow of Mossadegh was what led to the 1979 revolution in Iran being so anti-American in nature, and to the persistence of anti-American sentiment in Iran. Iran’s relations with the United States were completely different. Throughout the 1970s, as Iran reaped enormous profits from oil production, a gap widened between the wealthy (many of whom were relatives of the Shah) and the poor. But not only had the deal proved a hard slog to seal, it had also largely been framed by the US as the best chance of containing the threat from Iran rather than being the overture to a blossoming friendship.Although Barack Obama famo… A huge majority would happily trade this Regime for the Shah. Posted by 9 days ago. The Shah was put in place in World War II, after England and Russia forced the abdication of his father, who refused to let Iran be used as a transport corridor for Allied supplies. Id. Iran got much much worse. It's up to them, really. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Share via Email Print. In that of the Islamic Republic, they were "fear," "death," "terror," "horror," and most frequent of all "nightmare", Abrahamian, Tortured Confessions (1999), p.135-6, 167, 169, Human rights during the Shah: https://old.reddit.com/r/iran/comments/9409ny/human_rights_under_mohammad_reza_pahlavi/. queen elizabeth). The demonstrations, mainly involving young students and people from the bazaars, grew steadily larger and more violent (at least against property such as banks, police buildings and cinemas; violence against persons by the demonstrators was rare, and overall the Iranian Revolution, despite shocking incidents and images, was much less bloody than the French or Russian revolutions). The Iranian Revolution was a gendered revolution; much of the new regime's rhetoric was centered on the position of women in Iranian society. 1, pp. Huda Jawad Send an email. The official subreddit of Iranians both in Iran and elsewhere. The revolution also precipitated a calamitous war between Iran and Iraq and an expansion of the U.S. military’s role in maintaining security in and around the Persian Gulf. Thinking Iran was weak, Iraqi forces invaded on September 22, 1980. But in little more than a generation, Iran had changed from a traditional, conservative, and rural … This created lots of danger to the country itself and its people. He was the heir to the throne and many of his social and economic reforms were quite progressive; perhaps too progressive. Before that, Iran had interaction with the rest of the world, said Hamedani. tion ˌrevəˈlo͞oSH(ə)n/ noun 1. a forcible overthrow of a government or social order in favor of a new system. In November, when the … The revolution led to a surge in Iranian-backed terrorism that continues, albeit in quite different forms, to this day. Incompetence of the regime and mismanagement of our resources has lead to lakes and rivers drying up, and water shortage is endangering the future of Iran. Less noticed, but equally significant, the revolution provoked a response by Saudi Arabia and various Sunni militant groups that set the The Islamic revolution has failed, but America’s hostility helps the clerics cling to power In some of its basic characteristics, the revolution did not conform to the usual norms of Western revolutions, because the state did not represent just an ordinary dictatorship but an absolute and arbitrary system that lacked political legitimacy and a social base virtually across the whole of the society. Paul. It has been doing so for many years, and it has grown quite practiced at it. The people wanted freedom, they got deceived by the Mullahs (and their backers); and the net outcome was a 40 year old con! There are at least 5 million Iranians who are starving, poverty is so rampant that by some measures more than 50% of Iranians live below the poverty line. Some forums can only be seen by registered members. Through the embassy takeover, Khomeini’s supporters could claim to be as “anti-imperialist” as the political left. Iran: The Iranian Revolution, 1978–79 Outwardly, with a swiftly expanding economy and a rapidly modernizing infrastructure, everything was going well in Iran. Iranian Revolution: Positive -The Iranian Revolution allowed the citizens of Iran religious freedom from the Shah. We use cookies on our websites for a number of purposes, including analytics and performance, functionality and advertising. There is essentially no "good" and "bad" in politics. Bad dude, no one is happy with the current situation. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Revolution isn't always a good thing. I mean, at least be fair on both sides. She was a good student in high school and studied economy but had to quit school and go underground when her elder brother was sought by the regime for his support for the PMOI. ''Prison life was drastically worse under the Islamic Republic than under the Pahlavis. Be on the lookout for your Britannica newsletter to get trusted stories delivered right to your inbox. We no longer enjoy personal freedoms that we had 40 years ago, in many ways we live in an apartheid state where women are treated as 2nd class citizens, and we have to abide by barbaric sharia laws that forced onto us. The regime carries out public hangings, lashing, and amputations as a way to scare the populace and take away people's humanity. Blindfolded American hostage with his Iranian captors outside the U.S. embassy in Tehrān, November 9, 1979. Incredibly, the far-fetched story really happened. We don't have religious freedom, leaving Islam is punishable by apostasy laws. I don't think anyone today would say it was a 'good' revolution. Shah was a benevolent dictator of sorts whose image of himself kind of got in his way. Before the 1979 revolution, Iran was ruled by a Western-supported monarchy led by Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, known colloquially as the Shah. But yea, from an external view point, it seems things were, in general, much better before. You shouldn't compare Iran to Saudi Arabia. Pahlavi was the name adopted by Reza Khan, a Cossack commander and the founder of the Pahlavi Dynasty. In the following four decades, intense controversy has erupted over the Islamic Republic’s socio-economic performance. By late 1970s, the economy had stagnated, and inflationled to a higher cost of living. I think that goes beyond "dependant" and into the realm of "puppet". Favorite Answer. Come to discuss Iranian Politics, Persian and Iranian History, Persian Art, Persian Cuisine, Iranian Music and much more. Islamic republic is much much much worse. prior to the Iranian Revolution, Iran was ruled by the Shah, a tyrant who gained power because of a coup backed by the United States. Saddam expected a quick victory. Hello, I'm a non-Iranian currently reading the graphic novel "Persepolis" and wanted to get some answers to some pressing questions I had about the history behind the book. Iranian women just before the Islamic Revolution. When the US and other world powers agreed in 2015 to lift sanctions on Iran in exchange for restrictions being placed upon its nuclear activity, it seemed as though Tehran was being brought in from the cold. After the Iranian parliament appointed United States financier Morgan Shuster as Treasurer General of Iran in 1911, an American was killed in Tehran by henchmen thought to be affiliated with Russian or British interests. The revolution was inevitable, and I think nowadays it's nothing more than just a historical fact. Elements within the clergy promptly moved to exclude their former left-wing, nationalist, and intellectual allies from any positions of power in the new regime, and a return to conservative social values was enforced. A recession beginning in 1975 increased tensions between the classes in Iran. It is the story of two villains making life difficult ... “good guys” and “bad guys” is helpful to our understanding of the cultures and history. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (Persian: محمدرضا پهلوی , pronounced [mohæmˈmæd reˈzɒː pæhlæˈviː]; 26 October 1919 – 27 July 1980), also known as Mohammad Reza Shah (محمدرضا شاه), was the last Shah of Iran from 16 September 1941 until his overthrow in the Iranian Revolution on 11 February 1979. Well, it depends. On my perspectives and the book about the Iranian Revolution that I just read,If the 1979 revolution never happened,Then Iran will be far worse than present day Iran,Iran which is ruled by the dictatorial Shah until 1979 was not a democratic nation but an authoritarian and corrupted nation which its people and its opposition was supervised by the Shah’s secret police SAVAK and those who oppose it will be … Iranian Revolution - Iranian Revolution - Aftermath: On April 1, following overwhelming support in a national referendum, Khomeini declared Iran an Islamic republic. To put it into perspective, in 1977 — two years before Iran’s Islamic Revolution — 44.5% of the population was 25 or younger. The revolution of February 1979 was a revolt of the society against the state. This anti-Western sentiment eventually manifested itself in the November 1979 seizure of 66 hostages at the U.S. embassy by a group of Iranian protesters demanding the extradition of the shah, who at that time was undergoing medical treatment in the United States (see Iran hostage crisis). These groups, which included clergy, landowners, intellectuals, and merchants, had previously come together in the Constitutional Revolution of 1905–11. The 1979 Iranian revolution promised three goals: social justice, freedom and democracy, and independence from great power tutelage.